Ports of Influence: China's Strategic Expansion Across Latin America

Latin America is no longer a passive periphery—it is an active node in China’s strategic information architecture.

While much attention is paid to China's naval activities in the South China Sea or the Western Pacific, a quieter and equally strategic campaign is underway thousands of miles from Beijing—across Latin America. Through a network of port construction, commercial acquisitions, and opaque agreements, China is steadily building the foundation for potential logistical, informational, and naval access spanning from the Pacific to the Atlantic, and through the Caribbean. This effort, largely under the radar of public discourse, raises critical questions about the future of maritime and multi-domain influence in the Western Hemisphere.

Beyond the Canal: A Wider Web of Strategic Access

Chinese state-owned firms, including China Merchants Port and COSCO, now have stakes in over 30 ports across Latin America and the Caribbean—from Latin America's southern cone up through Mexico and into island nations like Jamaica and the Bahamas. While U.S. policymakers have focused heavily on the Panama Canal zone, Chinese involvement is far broader and more diverse. Notable examples include Kingston in Jamaica—controlled by China Merchants and ranked among the highest in regional risk due to its proximity to U.S. bases; and Manzanillo and Veracruz in Mexico, both major hubs for U.S.-linked trade and Chinese logistics. In the Bahamas and the Dominican Republic, Chinese-operated terminals were constructed under BRI-era loans and are now deeply embedded in the regional maritime landscape.

One of the most visible developments remains the Chinese state-owned enterprise COSCO's operation of Chancay Port in Peru, which opened in late 2024. Touted as a commercial gateway for Latin American exports to China, the port offers deep-water berthing, exclusive operational control, and logistical throughput that could support more than just container ships. With Chinese-designed cranes, warehousing systems, proprietary IT infrastructure, and potential satellite relay capabilities, Chancay resembles other COSCO-operated ports like Piraeus or Gwadar—optimized for rapid throughput but built with dual-use and multi-domain potential.

Beyond Peru, Chinese firms have signed or proposed Memoranda of Understanding (MoUs) to build or operate ports in Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay, and Chile, as well as across the Caribbean and Central America. These agreements often include vaguely defined infrastructure provisions and are paired with Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) financing, making them economically attractive—but strategically opaque. Some MoUs and project documents include phrases such as “facilities for logistical and emergency support,” or “infrastructure to support international peacekeeping and humanitarian missions,” which critics have flagged as potential euphemisms for military dual-use capability. These ports are often integrated into larger ecosystems—logistical, technological, and informational—including rail, highway, surveillance, satellite, and data networks that blur the lines between civil infrastructure and military readiness. Beijing is also in talks to build a transcontinental railway linking Brazil’s Atlantic coast with Peru’s Pacific ports—an ambitious effort to bypass the Panama Canal altogether and deepen its logistical control over Latin American supply chains.

Mexico and the Caribbean: The Quiet Northern Arc

While Latin America's southern states have drawn increasing scrutiny from analysts, China's infrastructure footprint in Mexico and the Caribbean is arguably even more geopolitically sensitive due to its proximity to the United States. In Kingston, Jamaica, China Merchants Port operates a facility situated alarmingly close to U.S. military installations at Guantanamo Bay and other forward-operating assets. This port, flagged as high-risk in multiple strategic assessments, could offer dual-use logistics or surveillance capabilities with minimal notice.

In Mexico, ports like Manzanillo and Veracruz handle substantial volumes of U.S.-linked trade and are closely tied to Chinese logistics networks through infrastructure projects and shipping agreements. Lázaro Cárdenas, though not currently under Chinese operation, represents Mexico's leading Pacific port and is strategically positioned to become a future node in China's logistics architecture, especially if BRI-affiliated financing expands.

Meanwhile, in the Bahamas and the Dominican Republic, China has constructed and partially operates container terminals funded through BRI-era loans. These facilities sit along major maritime routes connecting the southeastern U.S. with the broader Atlantic, making them ideal candidates for intelligence collection, strategic monitoring, or even covert refueling operations in a crisis. The relatively muted U.S. policy response to these developments stands in stark contrast to the attention given to Panama, leaving critical vulnerabilities unaddressed in America's own neighborhood.

Strategic Blind Spots and the Counter-Containment Doctrine

Part of what makes Latin America so strategically valuable to Beijing is its relative obscurity in U.S. grand strategy. Unlike the Indo-Pacific, where Chinese military expansion is tracked with intensity, the Western Hemisphere remains a quiet theater—an overlooked flank. This low visibility has enabled China to construct what amounts to a multi-domain support network in slow motion, largely shielded from international attention or strategic pushback. Chinese strategists refer to these efforts as a form of “counter-containment”—strategic positioning that undermines the geographic constraints and chokepoints imposed by U.S. and allied naval architecture in East and Southeast Asia.

U.S. security priorities have homed in on the Panama Canal, triggering moves like a $22.8 billion buyout of CK Hutchison’s Panama Canal terminals by a U.S.-led consortium, and congressional hearings emphasizing canal sovereignty and Chinese access. However, this narrow focus neglects other Chinese-influenced ports like Kingston or Manzanillo, which collectively handle between $63–134 million in U.S. trade daily and sit close to U.S. military installations. This neglect creates blind spots that could prove dangerous. By concentrating on a single strategic chokepoint while ignoring the broader architecture China is building, the U.S. risks being strategically outflanked in its own hemisphere.

The strategic implications for the U.S. are significant. Ports under Chinese influence allow for the potential collection of intelligence on U.S. and allied ship movements, cargo manifests, and personnel activity. Dual-use facilities—such as containerized missile systems or ISR arrays—could be covertly deployed under commercial cover. Control of key maritime nodes also gives China economic leverage over U.S. trade flows and infrastructure security. Perhaps most critically, the presence of Chinese-influenced ports within the U.S. near-abroad—such as in Jamaica, Mexico, or the Bahamas—could blunt U.S. deterrence options in a regional or global crisis.

While Panama rightly captures public attention, the geographic scope of Chinese port activity extends far beyond. The network of dual-use facilities in Mexico and the Caribbean remains under-scrutinized. Together, these assets—positional, commercial, and informational—form a quiet but potent web of strategic influence uncomfortably close to the United States. They deserve far more comprehensive attention from policymakers tasked with safeguarding hemispheric security.

Dual-Use Infrastructure and Sea-Land-Air Integration

The Chancay Port project offers a textbook example of how Beijing combines commercial investments with latent military and intelligence potential. COSCO Shipping Ports holds a 60% stake in the terminal, which includes exclusive rights to operate and manage the facility for decades. Though publicly marketed as a commercial logistics hub, defense analysts have flagged the port as a potential dual-use and dual-domain asset—capable of hosting PLA Navy (PLAN) vessels, storing fuel, housing ISR (intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance) equipment, or even acting as a satellite ground station.

This integration of sea, land, and air capabilities is increasingly visible across Chinese infrastructure abroad. Ports are no longer just terminals—they are potential multi-domain platforms. China's 2010 National Defense Mobilization Law and 2017 National Intelligence Law obligate state-owned firms to support national defense objectives, meaning COSCO could legally be required to accommodate PLA and Strategic Support Force activities during a geopolitical crisis.

The Espacio Lejano satellite tracking station in Argentina’s Patagonia, now operated by the PLA Aerospace Support Force (PLAAF) following the dissolution of the PLA Strategic Support Force in April 2024, exemplifies how China embeds space-domain assets under the guise of civil research. Similar capabilities—downlink stations, telemetry hubs, and signal intelligence relays—could quietly emerge in or near Chinese-operated ports in Chile and Peru. These facilities may support satellite monitoring, ocean-floor mapping, or even undersea cable surveillance under scientific pretense.

Civil-Military Integration as Strategic Doctrine

China’s approach to expanding strategic reach through commercial means is rooted in its long-standing policy of Civil-Military Integration (CMI)—a national-level strategy formally elevated in 2015 under President Xi Jinping. Though elements of CMI trace back to earlier decades, it was during the 2010s that the policy was consolidated into a systematic effort to fuse civilian infrastructure, technology, logistics, and industry with military objectives.

CMI mandates that private and state-owned enterprises—particularly in sectors like aerospace, shipping, telecommunications, and logistics—serve as force multipliers for the PLA. It is not merely a policy suggestion; it is codified into law through instruments like the 2017 National Intelligence Law, which requires all Chinese organizations and citizens to assist national intelligence efforts.

In practice, CMI allows China to leverage civilian global assets for military support while avoiding the political risks of overt military expansion. This strategy is particularly evident in Latin America, where commercial port and telecom projects are dual-use by design. When combined with the Belt and Road Initiative, CMI becomes an expansive strategic toolkit: infrastructure built under BRI auspices can be militarized in a crisis, enabling Beijing to operate globally without declaring military basing.

Notably, Huawei has played a central role in this integration. As of 2023, Huawei infrastructure was installed in over 70% of Latin American countries' 4G networks, and the company is involved in over 30 Safe City surveillance projects across the region, including in Argentina, Brazil, Ecuador, and Bolivia. These systems combine facial recognition, real-time video, license plate tracking, and AI analytics—technologies that may serve dual civilian and military use when networked with maritime and satellite systems.

Argentina, Brazil, and Uruguay as Integrated Strategic Nodes

In Argentina, Chinese firms have negotiated infrastructure development in Rio Grande, a deep-water port on the Atlantic. Officially framed as a grain logistics hub, the facility’s specifications—fuel storage, reinforced quays, and high-volume IT architecture—suggest it could be retooled to support not only maritime operations but also satellite support and ISR staging. Argentina's openness to Chinese tech in telecommunications and space tracking complements this dual-use potential.

In Brazil, the focus on Paranaguá has emphasized agricultural throughput, but Chinese-installed automation and logistics software raise data security flags. If combined with ground relay stations or mobile telemetry modules, such ports could quietly assist China’s expanding near-Earth surveillance net. These systems can be operated via non-military actors under China's civil-military fusion doctrine.

Uruguay, with ongoing discussions on new terminals and digital port management systems, offers a similar integration opportunity. The country’s receptivity to Chinese smart-city technologies hints at a future where ports double as surveillance and signal collection hubs, linked to broader PRC data architectures.

Chile and the Quiet Pacific Arc

In Chile, Chinese logistics investments focus on Valparaíso and Antofagasta—critical not just for trade, but for undersea cable proximity and signal intelligence potential. Ports near subsea cable routes are ideal for covert data access, and Chinese research vessels operating from these locations may be tasked with deep-sea mapping that informs future maritime domain awareness operations.

The Chinese footprint in northern Chile’s mining logistics also offers terrestrial pathways for moving equipment, setting up communications infrastructure, or installing ground-based antennas and ISR nodes. These developments point toward a Pacific Arc of influence—stretching from Peru to Argentina—where ports do more than just move goods; they move information, signals, and strategic leverage.

Strategic Implications, Commercial Leverage, and Civil-Military Fusion Abroad

The convergence of Chinese logistics, aerospace, and surveillance infrastructure in Latin America is not coincidental—it reflects an emerging strategy of sea-land-air integration through port control. These efforts align with China’s broader strategic priorities: to ensure global maritime redundancy, protect food and trade lifelines, and quietly construct multi-domain support nodes beyond the Indo-Pacific.

Critically, China achieves this strategic reach without a sprawling global network of military bases. Instead, it relies on the commercial footprint of its state-owned logistics giants. COSCO and China Merchants Group operate one of the largest merchant fleets in the world, far outstripping the capacity of the U.S. Merchant Marine, which has steadily declined over the past several decades. While the U.S. maintains global military basing, China has compensated through commercial access that can be converted into military utility on demand. Civilian captains, shipping managers, and port operators may be legally obligated under Chinese law to support national defense objectives abroad.

PLAN vessels could dock in these ports under commercial pretense. Space and signal infrastructure may operate via civilian contractors. Surveillance systems can be activated through dual-use telecom installations. Together, they form a distributed network of latent capabilities ready to be activated in crisis or competition.

Precedent matters. Chinese warships have docked in COSCO-operated Piraeus, and PLAN has sustained operations out of Djibouti, a port that started as BRI infrastructure. The next iteration of such strategic positioning may rely less on overt military facilities and more on a fused architecture of ports, antennas, and data nodes disguised as trade enablers.

Reshaping the Strategic Map of the Americas

Latin America is no longer a passive periphery—it is an active node in China’s strategic information architecture. With COSCO ports potentially hosting ground stations, Huawei-managed cities feeding real-time surveillance data, and sea-floor research vessels gathering cable intelligence, the region may quietly support China’s global ISR and command footprint.

Western nations must recognize that the maritime BRI is not just about shipping—it’s about sensing, signaling, and securing future options. As China builds infrastructure on the far shore, the maritime map of the Americas is being reshaped—not only by ships and trade, but by the silent architecture of a new era in great power competition.

If you like our work, please consider subscribing or buying us a coffee.

Thank you!